IMMIGRATION CENTRE PLANNING PERMISSION REFUSED

Last night Crawley Borough Council Development Control Committee rejected by 14 votes to 1 the planning application by Arora International Hotels Ltd. for permission to convert the 254 bed Mercure Hotel in Povey Cross Road, Crawley into an immigration detention centre.

During the meeting, apart from the council planning officers, only two
people spoke in favour of the application - the applicant himself, Tim
Jurdon, Head of Planning Arora Management Services Ltd., and Surinder
Arora, sole owner of the Arora hotels chain. Those that spoke against it
included a representatives of 11 of the 12 nearest residential houses to
the hotel, a neighbouring hotel, a Reigate and Banstead councillor and
Bill MacKeith representing the Close Campsfield campaign and SERTUC.

Members of the planning committee itself spoke out almost universally
against their own planning officers recommendations, placing special focus
on their interpretation and claimed misrepresentation of the wording of
GAT4 in the Crawley Borough Local Plan 2000. This states, "planning
permission will not be granted within the airport boundary which is not
CLEARLY required for operational, functional, safety or security reasons."
[our emphasis - see footnote [4] for explanation]

Unfortunately, the planning meeting also revealed the general level of
ignorance of the role and function of Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs),
even amongst supposedly informed elected representatives. The function of
IRCs is not solely, or even largely, that of holding of so-called 'failed'
asylum seekers prior to removal, it is the 'administrative detention' of
people within the asylum process and those prior to removal. Each year
hundreds of people pass through IRCs that are eventually granted leave to
remain in the UK.

Additionally, nothing was made of the objection by Sussex Police, which
stated that only 13% of detainee removals from Tinsley and Brook Houses,
the 2 existing Crawley detention centres, had been via Gatwick Airport
itself. As Tinsley and Brook Houses only represent approximately 18% of
the UK detention estate, Gatwick can hardly be considered an immigration
removal hub and any additional development would have required significant
additional vehicle movements from Crawley to Stanstead and Heathrow, the 2
main airports used for deportation flights, contrary to local authority
sustainability commitments.

Notes for editors:

[1] The planning application and relevant details can be found at:
http://tinyurl.com/AroraApp
[2] Established in 1999, Arora International Hotels is one of the UK's
fastest growing privately owned hotel companies, with six luxury hotels in
and around Heathrow and Gatwick airports and one in Manchester city
centre. For details of the Mercure, see:
http://www.mercure.com/gb/hotel-7059-mercure-london-gatwick-airport/inde...
[3] For more background on the application, see:
http://www.corporatewatch.org/?lid=3432
[4] As represented in point 4.6 of the report [No. RS. 13] drawn up for
the Development Control Meeting, the councils planning officers appeared
to have miss represented the text of the Crawley Borough Local Plan 2000
by stating: "Policy GAT4 states that planning permission will not be
granted within the airport boundary which is not required for operational,
functional, safety or security reasons", leaving out the word 'clearly'.
[5] No Borders Brighton had lobbied all 37 Crawley councillors with a
signed statement in opposition to the development, based on the health
effects on detainee children, that was endorsed by Dr Caroline Lucas Green
Party MEP for SE England, Ben Duncan Brighton and Hove City Councillor and
a Green Party parliamentary candidate & the South East Region TUC amongst
others. see:
http://nobordersbrighton.blogspot.com/2010/01/statement-in-opposition-to...